Link to GitHub Repository
Tech Pulse
Back to Home →

LLM Tiers: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

This guide presents a structured classification system for Large Language Models (LLMs), helping you assess which models are best suited for various applications based on capabilities, performance, and resource requirements.

flowchart TB
    LLM[LLM Classification] --> S[S Tier\nState-of-the-art]
    LLM --> A[A Tier\nHigh Performance]
    LLM --> B[B Tier\nMid-level]
    LLM --> C[C Tier\nEntry-level]
    LLM --> D[D Tier\nFoundational]
    
    S --> S1[Cutting-edge performance]
    S --> S2[Advanced reasoning]
    S --> S3[Multi-modal capabilities]
    S --> S4[Long-context support]
    
    A --> A1[Reliable performance]
    A --> A2[Cost-effective]
    A --> A3[Excellent for business use]
    A --> A4[High-quality outputs]
    
    B --> B1[Solid performance]
    B --> B2[Limited scalability]
    B --> B3[Good for niche tasks]
    B --> B4[Moderate reasoning]
    
    C --> C1[Basic capabilities]
    C --> C2[Lightweight]
    C --> C3[Low-complexity tasks]
    C --> C4[Resource-constrained environments]
    
    D --> D1[Minimal capabilities]
    D --> D2[Research/experimental]
    D --> D3[Academic purposes]
    D --> D4[Not for production]

    classDef tier fill:#f9f,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
    classDef features fill:#ddf,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    class S,A,B,C,D tier
    class S1,S2,S3,S4,A1,A2,A3,A4,B1,B2,B3,B4,C1,C2,C3,C4,D1,D2,D3,D4 features

Key Criteria for LLM Tier Classification

Performance Metrics

  • Reasoning and Comprehension: Ability to perform complex reasoning, understand context, and generate coherent responses
  • Accuracy: Precision in generating relevant and factual outputs
  • Multitask Capabilities: Proficiency across domains such as coding, creative writing, and summarization

Technical Considerations

  • Model Size and Complexity: Larger models typically offer better performance but demand greater computational resources
  • Adaptability: Ease of fine-tuning and customization for domain-specific applications
  • Multilingual Support: Capability to handle multiple languages effectively

Practical Factors

  • Cost and Accessibility: Compute resources required and associated operational expenses
  • Licensing Terms: Open-source availability versus proprietary restrictions
  • Specialization: General-purpose versus task-specific optimization
  • Benchmark Performance: Scores on standardized evaluations (GLUE, SuperGLUE, MMLU, etc.)
mindmap
  root((LLM Tier<br>Classification<br>Criteria))
    Performance
      Reasoning
      Accuracy
      Multitask Capabilities
      Benchmark Scores
    Technical
      Model Size
      Parameter Count
      Architecture
      Adaptability
    Practical
      Cost
      Accessibility
      Licensing
      Compute Requirements
    Specialization
      General Purpose
      Domain-Specific
      Task-Optimized

LLM Tier Breakdown

S Tier: State-of-the-Art Models

The highest-performing models excelling across a wide range of complex tasks with:

  • State-of-the-art capabilities across multiple domains
  • Exceptional reasoning and problem-solving abilities
  • Advanced multi-modal features and long-context support
  • Highest versatility and adaptability

A Tier: High-Performance Models

Reliable models approaching S Tier but with certain limitations:

  • Strong performance in most applications
  • Excellent cost-to-capability ratio
  • High-quality outputs for business applications
  • Good customization potential

B Tier: Mid-Level Performance

Solid performers with more significant constraints:

  • Consistent performance for specific use cases
  • Moderate reasoning and generalization capabilities
  • Lower computational requirements
  • Good for focused applications with defined parameters

C Tier: Entry-Level Models

Basic models suitable for simpler applications:

  • Adequate performance for straightforward tasks
  • Lightweight implementation requirements
  • Suitable for resource-constrained environments
  • Often older generation or smaller architectures

D Tier: Foundational Models

Minimal capability models primarily for research or education:

  • Basic language capabilities
  • Extremely lightweight implementation
  • Suitable for academic exploration or training
  • Not recommended for production environments
%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': { 'primaryColor': '#007bff', 'primaryTextColor': '#fff', 'primaryBorderColor': '#007bff', 'lineColor': '#303030', 'secondaryColor': '#006699', 'tertiaryColor': '#fff' }}}%%
graph TD
    subgraph Performance[Performance Spectrum]
        S[S Tier] --- A[A Tier] --- B[B Tier] --- C[C Tier] --- D[D Tier]
    end
    
    subgraph Budget[Budget Requirements]
        S1[High] --- A1[Moderate] --- B1[Low] --- C1[Minimal] --- D1[Minimal]
    end
    
    subgraph Resources[Resource Requirements]
        S2[Extensive] --- A2[Significant] --- B2[Moderate] --- C2[Low] --- D2[Very Low]
    end
    
    subgraph Tasks[Task Complexity]
        S3[Complex & Advanced] --- A3[Moderate to Complex] --- B3[Moderate] --- C3[Basic] --- D3[Very Basic]
    end
    
    subgraph Customize[Customization Potential]
        S4[Highly Flexible] --- A4[Flexible] --- B4[Limited] --- C4[Basic] --- D4[Minimal]
    end
    
    S --- S1
    S --- S2
    S --- S3
    S --- S4
    
    A --- A1
    A --- A2
    A --- A3
    A --- A4
    
    B --- B1
    B --- B2
    B --- B3
    B --- B4
    
    C --- C1
    C --- C2
    C --- C3
    C --- C4
    
    D --- D1
    D --- D2
    D --- D3
    D --- D4

    classDef sTier fill:#6a0dad,color:white,stroke-width:2px
    classDef aTier fill:#4169e1,color:white,stroke-width:2px
    classDef bTier fill:#228b22,color:white,stroke-width:2px
    classDef cTier fill:#ff8c00,color:white,stroke-width:2px
    classDef dTier fill:#cd5c5c,color:white,stroke-width:2px
    
    class S,S1,S2,S3,S4 sTier
    class A,A1,A2,A3,A4 aTier
    class B,B1,B2,B3,B4 bTier
    class C,C1,C2,C3,C4 cTier
    class D,D1,D2,D3,D4 dTier

Purpose of LLM Tiering

LLM classification tiers serve several critical functions for organizations implementing AI solutions:

Strategic Decision Support

  • Optimize Model Selection: Match appropriate models to specific task requirements
  • Resource Allocation: Balance performance needs with available computational resources
  • Cost Management: Align budget constraints with performance expectations

Implementation Guidance

  • Technical Planning: Inform infrastructure and deployment requirements
  • Clear Expectations: Set realistic performance and capability benchmarks
  • Risk Management: Understand limitations and potential failure points

Long-term Planning

  • Upgrade Pathways: Define clear progression paths as needs evolve
  • Future-proofing: Anticipate technological advancements and scaling requirements
  • Performance Benchmarking: Establish consistent evaluation frameworks
flowchart LR
    PURPOSE[Purpose of LLM Tiering]
    
    PURPOSE --> DECISION[Decision Support]
    PURPOSE --> IMPLEMENTATION[Implementation Guidance]
    PURPOSE --> PLANNING[Strategic Planning]
    
    DECISION --> D1[Model Selection Optimization]
    DECISION --> D2[Resource Allocation]
    DECISION --> D3[Budget Alignment]
    
    IMPLEMENTATION --> I1[Technical Requirements]
    IMPLEMENTATION --> I2[Performance Expectations]
    IMPLEMENTATION --> I3[Limitation Awareness]
    
    PLANNING --> P1[Upgrade Pathways]
    PLANNING --> P2[Future-proofing]
    PLANNING --> P3[Performance Benchmarking]
    
    style PURPOSE fill:#6495ed,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
    style DECISION fill:#7b68ee,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style IMPLEMENTATION fill:#9370db,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style PLANNING fill:#8a2be2,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    
    style D1 fill:#e6e6fa,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style D2 fill:#e6e6fa,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style D3 fill:#e6e6fa,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    
    style I1 fill:#f0f8ff,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style I2 fill:#f0f8ff,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style I3 fill:#f0f8ff,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    
    style P1 fill:#f5f5f5,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style P2 fill:#f5f5f5,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style P3 fill:#f5f5f5,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px

LLM Tier Selection Guide

S Tier Selection Criteria: Cutting-Edge Performance

Best For:

  • Advanced reasoning and multi-step problem-solving requirements
  • Applications demanding state-of-the-art capabilities across domains
  • Enterprise deployments requiring highest reliability and versatility
  • Situations where budget constraints are secondary to performance

Example Use Cases:

  • Sophisticated conversational AI assistants for enterprise deployment
  • Advanced technical and scientific research applications
  • Complex creative content generation (screenwriting, long-form content)
  • High-stakes decision support systems

A Tier Selection Criteria: High Quality and Cost-Effective

Best For:

  • Balancing strong performance with reasonable operational costs
  • Applications requiring reliable but not necessarily cutting-edge results
  • Business implementations with moderate resource availability
  • Domain-specific deployments with focused requirements

Example Use Cases:

  • Customer service automation and chatbots
  • Robust content generation and summarization
  • Medium-complexity code generation and assistance
  • Enterprise knowledge management systems

B Tier Selection Criteria: Mid-Level Performance for Focused Tasks

Best For:

  • Specific, well-defined use cases with limited scope
  • Environments with meaningful resource constraints
  • Prototype development and proof-of-concept implementations
  • Applications with straightforward requirements

Example Use Cases:

  • Document summarization and content classification
  • Basic to moderate question-answering systems
  • Simple chatbots and automated responses
  • Content generation where absolute precision isn’t critical

C Tier Selection Criteria: Entry-Level or Lightweight Models

Best For:

  • Basic applications with minimal complexity
  • Highly resource-constrained environments
  • Educational and training implementations
  • Non-critical applications with basic requirements

Example Use Cases:

  • Academic exercises and educational demonstrations
  • Simple text completion and basic analysis
  • Lightweight processing of structured inputs
  • Applications where response time is prioritized over sophistication

D Tier Selection Criteria: Foundational/Research Models

Best For:

  • Exploration and experimentation with NLP concepts
  • Extremely resource-limited environments
  • Academic research on fundamental language modeling
  • Applications where performance expectations are minimal

Example Use Cases:

  • Edge computing and embedded systems
  • Academic research and experimentation
  • Initial prototyping and concept validation
  • Learning environments for AI education

Comparison Matrix: Factors to Consider

Factor S Tier A Tier B Tier C Tier D Tier
Budget Requirements High Moderate Low Minimal Minimal
Performance Expectations Cutting-edge High Moderate Basic Foundational
Resource Availability Extensive Moderate Limited Very Limited Minimal
Task Complexity Complex Moderate to Complex Moderate Basic Very Basic
Customization Potential Highly Flexible Flexible Limited Basic Minimal
Deployment Scope Enterprise Department/Team Specific Application Single Function Experimental
Risk Tolerance Low Moderate Moderate-High High Very High 
graph TD
    START[Selection Start] --> Q1{High Performance<br>Requirements?}
    Q1 -->|Yes| Q2{Budget<br>Constraints?}
    Q1 -->|No| Q3{Specific Use<br>Case Only?}
    
    Q2 -->|Minimal| S[S Tier]
    Q2 -->|Moderate| A[A Tier]
    Q2 -->|Significant| Q4{Complex<br>Reasoning<br>Needed?}
    
    Q4 -->|Yes| A[A Tier]
    Q4 -->|No| B[B Tier]
    
    Q3 -->|Yes| Q5{Resource<br>Constraints?}
    Q3 -->|No| Q6{Educational/<br>Research<br>Purpose?}
    
    Q5 -->|Significant| C[C Tier]
    Q5 -->|Moderate| B[B Tier]
    
    Q6 -->|Yes| D[D Tier]
    Q6 -->|No| C[C Tier]
    
    S -->|Provides| S1[Advanced Reasoning<br>State-of-the-art Performance<br>Multi-modal Capabilities]
    A -->|Provides| A1[Reliable Results<br>Good Performance/Cost<br>Suitable for Business]
    B -->|Provides| B1[Focused Capabilities<br>Moderate Performance<br>Specific Use-Cases]
    C -->|Provides| C1[Basic Functionality<br>Lightweight<br>Simple Applications]
    D -->|Provides| D1[Minimal Capabilities<br>Research-Oriented<br>Educational Value]
    
    classDef start fill:#22c55e,color:white,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
    classDef question fill:#f97316,color:white,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    classDef tier fill:#3b82f6,color:white,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    classDef features fill:#f5f5f5,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px,stroke-dasharray: 5 5
    
    class START start
    class Q1,Q2,Q3,Q4,Q5,Q6 question
    class S,A,B,C,D tier
    class S1,A1,B1,C1,D1 features

LLMs Tier List - 2024

The landscape of Large Language Models continues to evolve rapidly, with new models and capabilities emerging regularly. Below is a current assessment of prominent LLMs across different tiers:

S Tier Models: State-of-the-Art

Gemini 2.0 Flash: Introduced in December 2024, this multimodal powerhouse processes various input types including audio. Its remarkable speed, zero cost, and performance rivaling GPT-40 make it exceptional for both reasoning and general-purpose applications.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: An elite model celebrated for outstanding efficiency and reliability across a wide application spectrum. Particularly noted for its performance-to-cost ratio.

GPT-40: While introducing omni-modality, some feature rollout delays allowed competitors like Gemini 2.0 Flash to gain market advantage. Nevertheless, remains a top-tier model with exceptional capabilities.

A Tier Models: High Performance

Claude 3.5 Haiku: Despite pricing controversies (double that of Claude 3 Haiku), provides solid functionality, though value comparison to free alternatives raises questions.

Mistral Large 2: A competent model with comprehensive capabilities, though restrictive licensing may deter some potential users.

Llama 3.1 (405B): The largest publicly available model to date with excellent performance and straightforward licensing terms.

DeepSeek V2.5: Successfully combines coding and general functionalities with excellent performance at a competitive API cost.

Phi4: A remarkable entry in the 14B parameter category, delivering substantial capability in a compact framework.

Llama 3.3 70B: Offers exceptional performance relative to its size, making it a standout in the parameter-efficient category.

B Tier Models: Solid Performers

Mistral Nemo: Once groundbreaking, this Mistral-Nvidia collaboration has been overtaken by newer model releases.

Qwen 2.5: Excels in mathematics and task-specific applications but shows limitations in general knowledge and instruction-following.

DeepSeek R1-Lite: A capable reasoning-focused model with good performance in analytical tasks.

Codestral: A standout coding model that outperforms many competitors (including Qwen 2.5) in programming domains.

GPT-40 Mini: Delivers decent performance but faces challenges competing with more aggressively priced alternatives.

Grok-2: An uncensored model available through Twitter and API, praised for its accessibility and unique positioning.

C Tier Models: Basic Functionality

Qwen 2.5 Coder: Initially generated significant interest but later criticized for reliance on proprietary benchmarks.

Mistral Pixtral/Ministral: Performance generally considered underwhelming with licensing limitations further reducing appeal.

Llama 3-2 Vision: Vision capabilities fail to impress compared to multimodal leaders.

O1 Mini: Limited capabilities relative to pricing position.

D Tier Models: Minimal Capabilities

Gemma 2: Widely regarded as disappointing due to limited capabilities relative to expectations.

QwQ: Despite positioning as an open-source alternative to O1, performance remains limited.

O1: Criticized for high pricing ($200) and lack of transparency regarding training methodologies.

Conclusion

The LLM tier classification system provides a structured framework for evaluating and selecting language models based on capabilities, performance, and resource requirements. As the landscape continues to evolve rapidly, this classification helps organizations make informed decisions aligned with their specific needs and constraints.

Key takeaways:

  • Strategic Selection: Match the LLM tier to your specific use case, budget, and performance requirements
  • Ongoing Evolution: The LLM landscape is highly dynamic, with models frequently shifting between tiers as new capabilities emerge
  • Performance/Resource Balance: Higher tiers generally deliver better performance but require greater resources
  • Deployment Context Matters: Consider your specific deployment environment, user expectations, and technical constraints

By utilizing this tiering system, organizations can navigate the complex LLM ecosystem more effectively, making strategic choices that optimize both performance and resource utilization.